<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Beyond Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Polemics, Critique and Analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on On Aditya Nigam&#8217;s &#8220;Genealogies of Globalisation&#8221; by vishwanath</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/on-aditya-nigams-genealogies-of-globalisation/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>vishwanath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/on-aditya-nigams-genealogies-of-globalisation/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>The question of identity and materiality needs to theorised very clearly.A.nigam's article in (himal-april) poses the same question.and also certain real  questions in india.especially,after 1977 ,we can see  a multitude of movements in india.the movements of movements politics have   raised new questions in indian body politics.All these movements are creating  mulitiple political  subjectivities and celebrating diffrerences.The difference based politics is often clashed with class politics.how can you analyse it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of identity and materiality needs to theorised very clearly.A.nigam&#8217;s article in (himal-april) poses the same question.and also certain real  questions in india.especially,after 1977 ,we can see  a multitude of movements in india.the movements of movements politics have   raised new questions in indian body politics.All these movements are creating  mulitiple political  subjectivities and celebrating diffrerences.The difference based politics is often clashed with class politics.how can you analyse it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Collective memory and prosecution by Ritwik Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/collective-memory-and-prosecution/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritwik Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/collective-memory-and-prosecution/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>You speak the truth here in this post. Movements are indeed reduced to leaders, and the leaders themselves are then reduced to objects of reverence of hatred. The pictures are always painted to suit the mood of the present hegemony. Education, almost always, is a mechanism to create a mass conducive to a certain line of thought; mass education as we imagine it, has never been an instrument of true enlightenment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You speak the truth here in this post. Movements are indeed reduced to leaders, and the leaders themselves are then reduced to objects of reverence of hatred. The pictures are always painted to suit the mood of the present hegemony. Education, almost always, is a mechanism to create a mass conducive to a certain line of thought; mass education as we imagine it, has never been an instrument of true enlightenment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by aradhanad</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/about/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>aradhanad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 21:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-105</guid>
		<description>great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Untouchability and Indian capitalism by Untouchability and Indian Capitalism at Blogbharti</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/untouchability-and-indian-capitalism/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Untouchability and Indian Capitalism at Blogbharti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/untouchability-and-indian-capitalism/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] Indian Capitalism   Published by bhupinder May 9th, 2007  in Dalit, Capitalism and Prejudice.      Pratyush Chandra reads The Observer&#8217;s story about Dalit entreprenuer Hari Pippal and wonders i... not so much of capitalism&#160; but of semi- feudalism. It shows how stratification specific to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indian Capitalism   Published by bhupinder May 9th, 2007  in Dalit, Capitalism and Prejudice.      Pratyush Chandra reads The Observer&#8217;s story about Dalit entreprenuer Hari Pippal and wonders i&#8230; not so much of capitalism&nbsp; but of semi- feudalism. It shows how stratification specific to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Untouchability and Indian capitalism by Hiren</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/untouchability-and-indian-capitalism/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/05/07/untouchability-and-indian-capitalism/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Very interesting writeup. THe original caste system was based on merit- it was talent and temprament that determined who and individual was and not birth but vested interests distorted the original system as it suited them. For every pippal who has the talent to move upwards there must be upperclass indians who are probably not suited to their "high profile" roles and do not want to move down. Talent also has a different connotation- 
&lt;a href="http://mypyp.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Make your passion your profession&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting writeup. THe original caste system was based on merit- it was talent and temprament that determined who and individual was and not birth but vested interests distorted the original system as it suited them. For every pippal who has the talent to move upwards there must be upperclass indians who are probably not suited to their &#8220;high profile&#8221; roles and do not want to move down. Talent also has a different connotation-<br />
<a href="http://mypyp.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Make your passion your profession</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Millionaire and Millions Poor by kk</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/one-millionaire-and-million-poor/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/one-millionaire-and-million-poor/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Ankur, if "labour reforms are necessary and should be same as other developed countries have", then India should accept "international labour standards" clause in world trade agreements. That would mean more labour security, not less as Indian businesses are demanding. Indian business and the Indian state are changing the labour laws not to have competition with international businesses at the same level, rather they want "comparative advantage" based on cheap labour and labour insecurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ankur, if &#8220;labour reforms are necessary and should be same as other developed countries have&#8221;, then India should accept &#8220;international labour standards&#8221; clause in world trade agreements. That would mean more labour security, not less as Indian businesses are demanding. Indian business and the Indian state are changing the labour laws not to have competition with international businesses at the same level, rather they want &#8220;comparative advantage&#8221; based on cheap labour and labour insecurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Millionaire and Millions Poor by ankur</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/one-millionaire-and-million-poor/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>ankur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/one-millionaire-and-million-poor/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Actually its right  at some extent . but if indian businesses have to be competitive on world lavel labour reforms are nessecary and should be same as  other developed countries have</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually its right  at some extent . but if indian businesses have to be competitive on world lavel labour reforms are nessecary and should be same as  other developed countries have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Indian expansionism&#8217;s ugly face - Hindu Fascism by ganesh</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/indian-expansionisms-ugly-face/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/indian-expansionisms-ugly-symptom-the-rise-of-hindu-fascists/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>how can you call the RSS FASCIST? WHAT'S THE "BASIS" on which on which you call the RSS as fascist?. Well if you really wanna know who's "fascist" then do log on to www.cpmterror.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can you call the RSS FASCIST? WHAT&#8217;S THE &#8220;BASIS&#8221; on which on which you call the RSS as fascist?. Well if you really wanna know who&#8217;s &#8220;fascist&#8221; then do log on to <a href="http://www.cpmterror.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpmterror.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Note on Party - An Institution or in Movement? by Saswat Pattanayak</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/a-note-on-party-an-institution-or-in-movement/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Saswat Pattanayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2007/04/01/a-note-on-party-an-institution-or-in-movement/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Very apt and relevant to our times, dear Pratyush. Thanks for a most insightful writing on the subject. 

I would also say most of our reflections often depend actually on the type of questions we probe into. A question such as, "are there no possibilities of outside party movements now" is to my view calls for equally problematic answer. Clearly this is a question that seeks a yes/no answer--no denying that. Moreover, the important question for a revolution anytime in history is not 'if there is any scope', but 'how to' build one. As Castro said prophetically once, the onus of the revolution lies with the revolutionary. If we miss the opportunity or if we do not work towards understanding conditions and contribute to them, then, only the in-party/out-party dilemmas  would continue to surface.

A party demands participation in the party affairs. Even as people may become members of the party (like most Soviet citizens once were) it is not expected that they work the nitty-gritty of the organizational setup, considering their other primary occupations. And even when people are not members of the party (like most of us in the world are), it is not necessary that we refrain from forwarding constructive critiques of the party. Having said that, no party whose aims/goals are not in consonance with the peoples it claims to represent can continue to be successful. Hence proverbially it is said, people often deserve the kind of government they elect. 

In this sense, the aspirations of the working class of the world must be truly represented by a party that claims itself to be communist. In doing so, the party would have justified its position. Unfortunately, when a communist party(ies) (as in India) fail(s) entirely to stand the test (by extending supports to puppets of capitalist class in greedy power structure), the question "Are there any" becomes redundant. The only question that matters now, is "how to build it now".

And to that, come, all of us peoples--in small and large measures, across religions and classes, across races and castes. across nations and boundaries. The movement--against the domestic neoliberals and international capitalists--is waiting to sweep across the planet. Most of us are impacted negatively by the land-grabbers. And we dont look at our party affiliations or job positions or the name of our church when we are deprived of equal claim to the earth's resources. And when we respond back--in every form possible for us, organizing through letters, speeches, and prison camps; inside schools, colleges, and marketplaces; against the greedy corporate bosses, sensational fox/cnn, and amazingly unbelievable mainstream politicians--we would not be looking at any party credentials. If we are members, well and fine. If we are not, well and fine. Revolution does not wait for ID cards. Neither does it wait for a tiny group of future ruling class. Only thing it requires for its goals to be fulfilled is a solidarity amongst peoples that have come together for the greater cause to bring about true equity and equality devoid of substantial or monopolistic private gains.

If we cannot stand in solidarity during our times--these times, we would have set a very ugly example for the future generations of radical minds, indeed a pathetic one. We owe it to the future of the earth to set out the goals afresh if we need amendments to any manifesto. But we also owe it to the future, to work towards realizing the goals ourselves without getting deterred by who has joined the party, or who has not joined one. Its the merry-making 'Party' after the liberation of mother earth from the current 'owners' that is the only party which matters. We will have fun, and we know that. A great celebration where we will not have to buy Archies greetings cards to invite anyone. Everyone will feel automatically invited. Thats the party. And this hope of that morning which Sahir once pinned for, is the great hope which we should strive for by working together, while we smile, and sing: Saathi Haath Badhana....

Laal Salaam!
Saswat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very apt and relevant to our times, dear Pratyush. Thanks for a most insightful writing on the subject. </p>
<p>I would also say most of our reflections often depend actually on the type of questions we probe into. A question such as, &#8220;are there no possibilities of outside party movements now&#8221; is to my view calls for equally problematic answer. Clearly this is a question that seeks a yes/no answer&#8211;no denying that. Moreover, the important question for a revolution anytime in history is not &#8216;if there is any scope&#8217;, but &#8216;how to&#8217; build one. As Castro said prophetically once, the onus of the revolution lies with the revolutionary. If we miss the opportunity or if we do not work towards understanding conditions and contribute to them, then, only the in-party/out-party dilemmas  would continue to surface.</p>
<p>A party demands participation in the party affairs. Even as people may become members of the party (like most Soviet citizens once were) it is not expected that they work the nitty-gritty of the organizational setup, considering their other primary occupations. And even when people are not members of the party (like most of us in the world are), it is not necessary that we refrain from forwarding constructive critiques of the party. Having said that, no party whose aims/goals are not in consonance with the peoples it claims to represent can continue to be successful. Hence proverbially it is said, people often deserve the kind of government they elect. </p>
<p>In this sense, the aspirations of the working class of the world must be truly represented by a party that claims itself to be communist. In doing so, the party would have justified its position. Unfortunately, when a communist party(ies) (as in India) fail(s) entirely to stand the test (by extending supports to puppets of capitalist class in greedy power structure), the question &#8220;Are there any&#8221; becomes redundant. The only question that matters now, is &#8220;how to build it now&#8221;.</p>
<p>And to that, come, all of us peoples&#8211;in small and large measures, across religions and classes, across races and castes. across nations and boundaries. The movement&#8211;against the domestic neoliberals and international capitalists&#8211;is waiting to sweep across the planet. Most of us are impacted negatively by the land-grabbers. And we dont look at our party affiliations or job positions or the name of our church when we are deprived of equal claim to the earth&#8217;s resources. And when we respond back&#8211;in every form possible for us, organizing through letters, speeches, and prison camps; inside schools, colleges, and marketplaces; against the greedy corporate bosses, sensational fox/cnn, and amazingly unbelievable mainstream politicians&#8211;we would not be looking at any party credentials. If we are members, well and fine. If we are not, well and fine. Revolution does not wait for ID cards. Neither does it wait for a tiny group of future ruling class. Only thing it requires for its goals to be fulfilled is a solidarity amongst peoples that have come together for the greater cause to bring about true equity and equality devoid of substantial or monopolistic private gains.</p>
<p>If we cannot stand in solidarity during our times&#8211;these times, we would have set a very ugly example for the future generations of radical minds, indeed a pathetic one. We owe it to the future of the earth to set out the goals afresh if we need amendments to any manifesto. But we also owe it to the future, to work towards realizing the goals ourselves without getting deterred by who has joined the party, or who has not joined one. Its the merry-making &#8216;Party&#8217; after the liberation of mother earth from the current &#8216;owners&#8217; that is the only party which matters. We will have fun, and we know that. A great celebration where we will not have to buy Archies greetings cards to invite anyone. Everyone will feel automatically invited. Thats the party. And this hope of that morning which Sahir once pinned for, is the great hope which we should strive for by working together, while we smile, and sing: Saathi Haath Badhana&#8230;.</p>
<p>Laal Salaam!<br />
Saswat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ceasefire and Democracy in Nepal - the Global Semantics by Paramendra Bhagat</title>
		<link>http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2006/04/07/ceasefire-and-democracy-in-nepal-the-global-semantics/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Paramendra Bhagat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondcapital.wordpress.com/2006/04/07/ceasefire-and-democracy-in-nepal-the-global-semantics/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Nepal: &lt;a HREF="http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/04/interim-constitution-revolutionary.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;Interim Constitution, Revolutionary Parliament&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nepal: <a HREF="http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/04/interim-constitution-revolutionary.html" REL="nofollow">Interim Constitution, Revolutionary Parliament</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
